PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUSTX vs. DFFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
0.51%4.45%2.21%2.52%-0.73%-0.06%0.89%0.14%-79.59%0.43%
DFFGX
DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio
0.87%3.12%5.29%5.01%-4.41%-1.27%0.39%2.52%1.17%0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUSTX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than DFFGX's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GUSTX has underperformed DFFGX with an annualized return of -13.82%, while DFFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.18% annualized return.


GUSTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.69%
3Y*
3.15%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
-13.82%

DFFGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.87%
6M
1.92%
1Y
2.99%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUSTX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DFFGX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GUSTX vs. DFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUSTX
GUSTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GUSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

DFFGX
DFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUSTXDFFGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.18

2.60

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

10.74

2.99

+7.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

7.08

3.97

+3.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

20.50

3.09

+17.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

58.55

9.14

+49.40

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUSTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is comparable to the DFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUSTX and DFFGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUSTXDFFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

2.60

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.98

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.55

0.76

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.49

-0.93

Correlation

The correlation between GUSTX and DFFGX is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Dividend Comparison

GUSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than DFFGX's 2.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSTX
GMO U.S. Treasury Fund
3.62%4.15%1.98%2.28%0.26%0.14%0.09%0.14%8.96%0.50%0.05%0.04%
DFFGX
DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio
2.86%2.98%4.87%3.57%1.85%0.15%0.29%1.83%1.53%1.18%0.99%1.27%

Drawdowns

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUSTX drawdown since its inception was -79.98%, which is greater than DFFGX's maximum drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUSTX and DFFGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GUSTXDFFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.98%

-10.09%

-69.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-1.00%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.19%

-6.49%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.98%

-6.49%

-73.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.89%

0.00%

-77.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-0.86%

-34.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.34%

-0.27%

Volatility

GUSTX vs. DFFGX - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Treasury Fund (GUSTX) has a higher volatility of 0.29% compared to DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX) at 0.15%. This indicates that GUSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GUSTXDFFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

0.15%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.83%

0.40%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27%

1.42%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.73%

1.85%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.44%

1.57%

+23.87%