GURU vs. EBI
GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GURU is passively managed, while EBI is actively managed. Over the past year, GURU returned 25.20% vs 31.58% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.
Performance
GURU vs. EBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 4.56% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 12.49% return.
GURU
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 25.20%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.78%
EBI
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 12.49%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GURU vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 4.56% | 22.80% |
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 12.49% | 15.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between GURU and EBI is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GURU and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GURU vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank
GURU
EBI
GURU vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURU | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.46 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 4.47 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 18.38 | -10.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURU | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.58 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 1.29 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
GURU vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than EBI's maximum drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and EBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURU | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -17.05% | -21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | -7.09% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.30% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -2.07% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.72% | +1.36% |
Volatility
GURU vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) at 3.50%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GURU | EBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 3.50% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 9.06% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 12.32% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 18.01% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 18.01% | +2.17% |
GURU vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
GURU vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison
GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than EBI's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBI Longview Advantage ETF | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GURU and EBI have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GURU has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to EBI (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs EBI's -17.05%.
On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 31.58% vs 25.20% for GURU. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, EBI has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 31.58% return vs 25.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GURU.
EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.11% for GURU.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.24% for EBI.
EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GURU and EBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer