GURU vs. DMAY
GURU (Global X Guru Index ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - GURU tracks the Solactive Guru Index while DMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GURU returned 7.41%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GURU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
GURU vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURU achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
GURU
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
GURU vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 7.06% | 25.43% | 23.76% | 19.28% | -27.94% | 8.19% | 37.07% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GURU and DMAY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between GURU and DMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GURU vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GURU
DMAY
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Technology
GURU
DMAY
Healthcare
GURU
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
GURU
DMAY
Industrials
GURU
DMAY
Financial Services
GURU
DMAY
Utilities
GURU
DMAY
Communication Services
GURU
DMAY
Energy
GURU
DMAY
Basic Materials
GURU
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
GURU
DMAY
Real Estate
GURU
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GURU vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
GURU
DMAY
GURU vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.60 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.73 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 22.76 | -13.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.65 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.80 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.88 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
GURU vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURU drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURU and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -13.90% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.22% | -3.36% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.73% | -12.38% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.50% | -13.90% | -24.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.30% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.67% | -2.24% | -6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.55% | +2.52% |
Volatility
GURU vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
Global X Guru Index ETF (GURU) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that GURU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GURU | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 0.84% | +3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 3.74% | +8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 4.73% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 9.02% | +11.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 8.43% | +11.73% |
GURU vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GURU vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
GURU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GURU Global X Guru Index ETF | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.57% | 0.22% | 0.09% | 2.75% | 0.35% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.22% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GURU and DMAY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GURU has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GURU dropped -38.50% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, GURU leads with 7.41% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, GURU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GURU has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GURU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DMAY.
GURU has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
GURU tracks Solactive Guru Index, while DMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect May Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GURU and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GURU and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer