GURIX vs. FSREX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Series Real Estate Income Fund (FSREX).
GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. FSREX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011.
Performance
GURIX vs. FSREX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GURIX vs. FSREX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 1.81% | 2.04% | 4.96% | 13.01% | -23.81% | 42.07% | 1.76% | 25.54% | -3.97% | 10.22% |
FSREX Fidelity Series Real Estate Income Fund | -0.40% | 8.93% | 9.87% | 8.29% | -11.78% | 15.78% | 0.58% | 16.02% | -0.73% | 5.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than FSREX's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GURIX has outperformed FSREX with an annualized return of 6.64%, while FSREX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.43% annualized return.
GURIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -0.64%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 6.28%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
FSREX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- 5.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GURIX vs. FSREX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FSREX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GURIX vs. FSREX — Risk / Return Rank
GURIX
FSREX
GURIX vs. FSREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Series Real Estate Income Fund (FSREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURIX | FSREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.96 | -1.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 2.70 | -2.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.41 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 2.14 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.33 | 10.21 | -8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURIX | FSREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.96 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.97 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.69 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.94 | -0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between GURIX and FSREX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GURIX vs. FSREX - Dividend Comparison
GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than FSREX's 5.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 2.22% | 2.40% | 5.18% | 3.07% | 6.79% | 5.60% | 7.81% | 6.25% | 3.05% | 5.37% | 4.52% | 16.81% |
FSREX Fidelity Series Real Estate Income Fund | 5.69% | 5.64% | 6.05% | 7.43% | 9.99% | 3.58% | 6.24% | 6.62% | 5.87% | 5.49% | 5.22% | 4.33% |
Drawdowns
GURIX vs. FSREX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FSREX drawdown of -32.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and FSREX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURIX | FSREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -32.02% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -2.90% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -15.22% | -15.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | -32.02% | -1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -1.76% | -6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -2.57% | -5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 0.61% | +2.17% |
Volatility
GURIX vs. FSREX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Fidelity Series Real Estate Income Fund (FSREX) at 1.06%. This indicates that GURIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GURIX | FSREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 1.06% | +2.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 1.67% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 3.02% | +12.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 4.80% | +12.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 7.89% | +10.08% |