GURIX vs. FRINX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX).
GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. FRINX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 14, 2010.
Performance
GURIX vs. FRINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GURIX vs. FRINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 3.34% | 2.04% | 4.96% | 13.01% | -23.81% | 42.07% | 1.76% | 25.54% | -3.97% | 10.22% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 0.33% | 6.87% | 7.61% | 9.01% | -14.79% | 18.64% | -1.36% | 17.52% | -1.93% | 6.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than FRINX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GURIX has outperformed FRINX with an annualized return of 6.80%, while FRINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.
GURIX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
FRINX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GURIX vs. FRINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FRINX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GURIX vs. FRINX — Risk / Return Rank
GURIX
FRINX
GURIX vs. FRINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 0.91 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.23 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.18 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.09 | -0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 4.54 | -2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.91 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.54 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between GURIX and FRINX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GURIX vs. FRINX - Dividend Comparison
GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than FRINX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 2.19% | 2.40% | 5.18% | 3.07% | 6.79% | 5.60% | 7.81% | 6.25% | 3.05% | 5.37% | 4.52% | 16.81% |
FRINX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A | 4.38% | 4.40% | 4.41% | 4.78% | 5.80% | 1.31% | 4.53% | 5.45% | 4.89% | 4.21% | 4.77% | 3.53% |
Drawdowns
GURIX vs. FRINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FRINX drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and FRINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -34.50% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -4.28% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -18.30% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | -34.50% | +1.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -2.72% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -3.41% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.03% | +1.78% |
Volatility
GURIX vs. FRINX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class A (FRINX) at 1.65%. This indicates that GURIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GURIX | FRINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 1.65% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 2.87% | +5.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 4.92% | +10.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 6.51% | +10.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 9.50% | +8.48% |