GURIX vs. FIKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX).
GURIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Mar 28, 2014. FIKMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 3.34% | 2.04% | 4.96% | 13.01% | -23.81% | 42.07% | 1.76% | 25.54% | -1.65% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 0.41% | 7.29% | 8.03% | 9.51% | -14.48% | 19.04% | -0.98% | 18.04% | -1.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GURIX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIKMX's 0.41% return.
GURIX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
FIKMX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 4.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GURIX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GURIX vs. FIKMX — Risk / Return Rank
GURIX
FIKMX
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) and Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GURIX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.27 | 0.99 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.48 | 1.32 | -0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.19 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.17 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 4.90 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GURIX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.99 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.61 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.52 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between GURIX and FIKMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Dividend Comparison
GURIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than FIKMX's 4.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GURIX Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund | 2.19% | 2.40% | 5.18% | 3.07% | 6.79% | 5.60% | 7.81% | 6.25% | 3.05% | 5.37% | 4.52% | 16.81% |
FIKMX Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z | 4.78% | 4.80% | 4.81% | 5.15% | 6.24% | 1.59% | 4.90% | 5.82% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GURIX drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, roughly equal to the maximum FIKMX drawdown of -34.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GURIX and FIKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GURIX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -34.49% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -4.35% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.30% | -18.04% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -2.72% | -3.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -5.26% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.04% | +1.77% |
Volatility
GURIX vs. FIKMX - Volatility Comparison
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund (GURIX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Income Fund Class Z (FIKMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that GURIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GURIX | FIKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 1.67% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 2.90% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 4.96% | +10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 6.52% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 10.69% | +7.29% |