PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUNR vs. NANR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUNR vs. NANR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly lower than NANR's 18.96% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed NANR with an annualized return of 10.05%, while NANR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.


GUNR

1D
-0.84%
1M
4.20%
6M
3.67%
YTD
14.39%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
6.50%

NANR

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.17%
6M
6.34%
YTD
18.96%
1Y
43.82%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
17.93%
10Y*
11.55%
ALL TIME*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$77.78M$41.91M$28.99M
$3.01M$2.18M$2.39M

GUNR vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
14.39%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%26.06%0.46%18.41%-9.42%18.74%
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
18.96%35.35%2.31%-3.23%26.49%36.43%1.03%18.99%-16.77%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GUNR and NANR is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2015

0.92

The correlation between GUNR and NANR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

GUNR vs. NANR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GUNR
NANR

Basic Materials

52.3%
45.6%

Energy

29.2%
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

11.8%
4.4%

Utilities

5.4%
0.0%

Communication Services

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.2%
1.5%

Technology

0.5%
0.1%

Industrials

0.5%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
7.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Basic Materials

GUNR
52.3%
NANR
45.6%

Energy

GUNR
29.2%
NANR
40.8%

Consumer Defensive

GUNR
11.8%
NANR
4.4%

Utilities

GUNR
5.4%
NANR
0.0%

Communication Services

GUNR
1.7%
NANR

-

Real Estate

GUNR
1.2%
NANR
1.5%

Technology

GUNR
0.5%
NANR
0.1%

Industrials

GUNR
0.5%
NANR
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GUNR
0.4%
NANR
7.0%

Financial Services

GUNR
0.0%
NANR
0.0%

Healthcare

GUNR

-

NANR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUNR vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NANR
NANR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GUNR vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUNRNANRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.58

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.76

10.33

-1.57

GUNR vs. NANR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUNR Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the NANR Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUNR and NANR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUNR vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum NANR drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and NANR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUNRNANRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.64%

-49.15%

+3.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-12.31%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-18.42%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

-26.42%

+2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

-49.15%

+6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-6.37%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-8.39%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

4.25%

-0.51%

Volatility

GUNR vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) have volatilities of 4.06% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUNRNANRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

4.11%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

14.51%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

19.19%

-3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

22.80%

-3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.33%

23.56%

-3.23%

GUNR vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUNR vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison

GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than NANR's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.34%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
1.77%1.77%2.20%2.78%2.70%2.61%2.73%2.02%1.95%1.83%5.01%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GUNR and NANR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NANR has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to GUNR (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUNR dropped -45.64% vs NANR's -49.15%.

On 10-year performance, NANR leads with 11.55% vs 10.05% for GUNR. On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NANR has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.77% for NANR.

GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index, while NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for GUNR and 0.35% for NANR.

NANR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUNR and NANR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer