PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUIRX vs. GSSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GUIRX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


GUIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.78%

GSSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.70%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%7.80%3.09%5.81%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GUIRX and GSSRX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.37

The correlation between GUIRX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUIRX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUIRXGSSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.53

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.96

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

13.08

-3.76

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUIRX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUIRXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.16

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.85

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

1.01

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.98

+0.12

Drawdowns

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and GSSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUIRXGSSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-9.03%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-1.62%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-1.62%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.16%

-8.88%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.21%

-9.03%

-5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.10%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-1.26%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.36%

+0.34%

Volatility

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GUIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUIRXGSSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.71%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

1.77%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

2.22%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

2.43%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

2.41%

+1.53%

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUIRX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUIRX and GSSRX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUIRX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUIRX dropped -14.21% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUIRX and GSSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer