PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUIRX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than GCIIX's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, GUIRX has underperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 2.78%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.97% annualized return.


GUIRX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.71%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.16%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.78%

GCIIX

1D
0.39%
1M
6.07%
YTD
12.60%
6M
15.21%
1Y
30.53%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*
10.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
1.70%4.73%3.66%6.37%-9.66%3.11%3.86%7.80%3.09%5.81%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
12.60%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between GUIRX and GCIIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

-0.01

The correlation between GUIRX and GCIIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUIRX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUIRX
GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUIRXGCIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.35

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.43

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

9.08

+0.25

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUIRX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUIRXGCIIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.96

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.76

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.32

+0.78

Drawdowns

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum GCIIX drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUIRXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.21%

-61.08%

+46.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-12.33%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-13.25%

+7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.16%

-30.58%

+16.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.21%

-39.85%

+25.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-15.04%

+12.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

3.29%

-2.59%

Volatility

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) is 0.91%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that GUIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUIRXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

4.87%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

12.70%

-10.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44%

15.30%

-12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

16.11%

-12.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

16.79%

-12.85%

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUIRX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than GCIIX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.91%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
GUIRX
Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class
3.74%4.90%3.86%2.78%2.06%2.16%2.38%2.84%3.04%3.23%3.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUIRX and GCIIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to GUIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUIRX dropped -14.21% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUIRX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer