GUIRX vs. FSMUX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GUIRX (Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, GUIRX returned 4.75%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GUIRX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.

Performance

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.

GUIRX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 2.16%
• 1Y: 6.57%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: 1.34%
• 10Y*: 2.78%

FSMUX

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class	1.70%	4.73%	3.66%	6.37%	-9.66%	0.46%
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	1.47%	3.14%	2.99%	6.78%	-11.25%	0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GUIRX and FSMUX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021	0.88

The correlation between GUIRX and FSMUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GUIRX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUIRX

GUIRX Risk / Return Rank: 72
GUIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GUIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
GUIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
GUIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GUIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FSMUX

FSMUX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FSMUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FSMUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FSMUX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FSMUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSMUX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GUIRX	FSMUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.69	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	4.63	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.71	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.15	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.33	11.49	-2.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUIRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the FSMUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUIRX and FSMUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GUIRX	FSMUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.69	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.11	+0.99

Drawdowns

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and FSMUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUIRX	FSMUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-16.27%	+2.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-2.68%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.33%	-5.95%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	0.00%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-5.46%	+3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	1.83%	-1.13%

Volatility

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) is 0.91%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that GUIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUIRX	FSMUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.91%	1.21%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.83%	2.10%	-0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44%	3.16%	-0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	4.64%	-0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.94%	4.64%	-0.70%

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison

GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund	2.99%	3.26%	3.74%	3.18%	2.14%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class	3.74%	4.90%	3.86%	2.78%	2.06%	2.16%	2.38%	2.84%	3.04%	3.23%	3.60%	3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUIRX and FSMUX in my portfolio?

GUIRX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUIRX or FSMUX?

FSMUX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to GUIRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUIRX dropped -14.21% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.