GUIRX vs. FSMUX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX).
GUIRX is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. FSMUX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 24, 2021.
Performance
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | -0.45% | 4.73% | 3.66% | 6.37% | -9.66% | 0.46% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | -1.13% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUIRX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's -1.13% return.
GUIRX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 2.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUIRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GUIRX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
GUIRX
FSMUX
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUIRX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.63 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.87 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 0.28 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.46 | 0.78 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUIRX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.63 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | -0.00 | +1.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GUIRX and FSMUX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
GUIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than FSMUX's 2.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUIRX Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class | 3.77% | 4.90% | 3.86% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 2.16% | 2.38% | 2.84% | 3.04% | 3.23% | 3.60% | 3.68% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.35% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUIRX drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUIRX and FSMUX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUIRX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -16.27% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.51% | -5.30% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.56% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.13% | -5.61% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 1.96% | -0.72% |
Volatility
GUIRX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Dynamic Municipal Income Fund Investor Class (GUIRX) is 0.89%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 0.99%. This indicates that GUIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GUIRX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.52% | 2.12% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56% | 6.65% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 4.67% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 4.67% | -0.74% |