GUGAX vs. TGRNX
GUGAX (GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund) and TGRNX (TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, GUGAX returned -0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TGRNX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GUGAX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than TGRNX's 0.68% return.
GUGAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.35%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
TGRNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 5.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUGAX GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund | 0.96% | 7.29% | 0.96% | 6.02% | -14.52% | -3.17% | 4.91% | 9.66% | 2.68% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 0.68% | 6.76% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -13.43% | -0.60% | 8.57% | 9.15% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUGAX and TGRNX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GUGAX and TGRNX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GUGAX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank
GUGAX
TGRNX
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GUGAX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.13 | 1.73 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 2.69 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.57 | 2.20 | +3.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.20 | 7.23 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GUGAX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.73 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.09 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.54 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, which is greater than TGRNX's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUGAX and TGRNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GUGAX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -17.85% | -20.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.16% | -2.47% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | -3.99% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.53% | -17.85% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -0.78% | -5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -5.23% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 0.75% | -0.32% |
Volatility
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) is 0.00%, while TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that GUGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GUGAX | TGRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 1.06% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.43% | 2.31% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 3.15% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 4.84% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 4.82% | +0.61% |
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GUGAX and TGRNX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison
GUGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than TGRNX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUGAX GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund | 4.52% | 3.69% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 2.90% | 7.96% | 5.74% | 5.08% | 2.43% | 3.29% | 1.76% |
TGRNX TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund | 4.29% | 4.31% | 4.48% | 3.30% | 2.69% | 2.76% | 4.20% | 4.38% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GUGAX and TGRNX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGRNX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUGAX dropped -38.57% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.
GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GUGAX and TGRNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer