PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUGAX vs. TGRNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUGAX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than TGRNX's 0.68% return.


GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
0.82%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
1.52%

TGRNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.68%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
0.68%6.76%3.08%5.73%-13.43%-0.60%8.57%9.15%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GUGAX and TGRNX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between GUGAX and TGRNX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUGAX vs. TGRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRNX
TGRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TGRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GUGAXTGRNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

1.73

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

2.69

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.57

2.20

+3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.20

7.23

+8.98

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the TGRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUGAX and TGRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GUGAXTGRNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.73

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.09

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.54

-0.46

Drawdowns

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, which is greater than TGRNX's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUGAX and TGRNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUGAXTGRNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-17.85%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.16%

-2.47%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-3.99%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.53%

-17.85%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-0.78%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.27%

-5.23%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.75%

-0.32%

Volatility

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) is 0.00%, while TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund (TGRNX) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that GUGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUGAXTGRNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.06%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.43%

2.31%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05%

3.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

4.84%

+1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.43%

4.82%

+0.61%

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GUGAX and TGRNX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

GUGAX vs. TGRNX - Dividend Comparison

GUGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than TGRNX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%
TGRNX
TIAA-CREF Green Bond Fund
4.29%4.31%4.48%3.30%2.69%2.76%4.20%4.38%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUGAX and TGRNX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGRNX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUGAX dropped -38.57% vs TGRNX's -17.85%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUGAX and TGRNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer