PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GUGAX vs. CPBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, GUGAX has underperformed CPBYX with an annualized return of 1.37%, while CPBYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return.


GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.96%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
-0.55%
10Y*
1.37%

CPBYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.60%
6M
-0.21%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
-0.06%
10Y*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%4.44%
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
0.00%7.38%3.52%5.51%-14.41%-0.34%9.85%12.26%-2.43%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GUGAX and CPBYX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2009

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between GUGAX and CPBYX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GUGAX vs. CPBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CPBYX
CPBYX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CPBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CPBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) and Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GUGAXCPBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

1.51

+3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.19

4.64

+10.55

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the CPBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUGAX and CPBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUGAX drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, which is greater than CPBYX's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUGAX and CPBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GUGAXCPBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.57%

-20.73%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.00%

-3.07%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.12%

-6.08%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.53%

-20.73%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

-20.73%

-2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.72%

-1.80%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-3.23%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

1.00%

-0.62%

Volatility

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) is 0.00%, while Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund (CPBYX) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that GUGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GUGAXCPBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.08%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.16%

2.93%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65%

3.67%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.57%

5.52%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

4.69%

+0.73%

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUGAX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CPBYX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GUGAX vs. CPBYX - Dividend Comparison

GUGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than CPBYX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CPBYX
Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund
4.66%4.68%4.90%3.87%3.76%3.16%5.94%4.13%3.74%3.10%3.20%3.81%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
3.45%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


GUGAX and CPBYX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CPBYX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUGAX dropped -38.57% vs CPBYX's -20.73%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GUGAX and CPBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer