GUBGX vs. TIVFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GUBGX (Victory RS International Fund) and TIVFX (American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GUBGX returned 9.31%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for TIVFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GUBGX charges 1.13%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for TIVFX.

Performance

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GUBGX achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than TIVFX's 35.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GUBGX having a 9.31% annualized return and TIVFX not far ahead at 9.61%.

GUBGX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 6M: 9.83%
• 1Y: 16.50%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

TIVFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 35.17%
• 6M: 39.21%
• 1Y: 66.10%
• 3Y*: 26.48%
• 5Y*: 11.10%
• 10Y*: 9.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund	6.92%	27.06%	5.35%	19.85%	-15.87%	14.07%	5.55%	21.71%	-10.61%	25.26%
TIVFX American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund	35.17%	36.15%	3.73%	15.43%	-20.57%	7.53%	12.61%	19.38%	-19.87%	24.18%

Correlation

The correlation between GUBGX and TIVFX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 1994	0.77

The correlation between GUBGX and TIVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.84 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GUBGX vs. TIVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GUBGX

GUBGX Risk / Return Rank: 15
GUBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GUBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GUBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
GUBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
GUBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

TIVFX

TIVFX Risk / Return Rank: 93
TIVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
TIVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TIVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
TIVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TIVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) and American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GUBGX	TIVFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	3.64	-2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	4.44	-2.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.61	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	5.75	-4.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.84	21.04	-16.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GUBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the TIVFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GUBGX and TIVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GUBGX	TIVFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	3.64	-2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.60	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.55	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.40	-0.11

Drawdowns

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GUBGX drawdown since its inception was -59.63%, which is greater than TIVFX's maximum drawdown of -54.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUBGX and TIVFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GUBGX	TIVFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.63%	-54.21%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.81%	-11.69%	-0.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.79%	-23.99%	+10.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.94%	-36.31%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.77%	-41.51%	+7.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-1.91%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.85%	-13.38%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	3.19%	+0.07%

Volatility

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS International Fund (GUBGX) is 5.10%, while American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund (TIVFX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that GUBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GUBGX	TIVFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	6.58%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	15.06%	-2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	18.47%	-2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	18.61%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.74%	17.62%	-0.88%

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GUBGX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TIVFX's 1.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GUBGX vs. TIVFX - Dividend Comparison

GUBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than TIVFX's 6.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GUBGX Victory RS International Fund	3.13%	3.34%	1.83%	1.88%	2.03%	4.17%	1.14%	0.06%	1.87%	1.69%	1.77%	1.55%
TIVFX American Beacon Tocqueville International Value Fund	6.53%	8.82%	10.23%	1.66%	1.39%	3.65%	0.34%	1.69%	1.37%	1.28%	1.57%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GUBGX and TIVFX in my portfolio?

GUBGX and TIVFX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GUBGX or TIVFX?

TIVFX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to GUBGX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GUBGX dropped -59.63% vs TIVFX's -54.21%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.64 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.