PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTTMX vs. DHTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) and Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund (DHTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTTMX achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than DHTAX's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, GTTMX has underperformed DHTAX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while DHTAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.


GTTMX

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.95%
6M
9.79%
YTD
14.70%
1Y
28.54%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
8.85%

DHTAX

1D
0.76%
1M
1.72%
6M
5.72%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
13.24%
ALL TIME*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
14.70%18.40%14.84%9.39%-13.90%41.28%5.12%24.18%-11.99%22.88%
DHTAX
Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund
8.39%13.28%12.75%30.19%-17.47%32.89%14.30%30.43%-12.44%19.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GTTMX and DHTAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between GTTMX and DHTAX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTTMX vs. DHTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTTMX
GTTMX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
GTTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GTTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DHTAX
DHTAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
DHTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
DHTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) and Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund (DHTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTTMXDHTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

2.03

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

5.08

+8.67

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the DHTAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTTMX and DHTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTTMX drawdown since its inception was -56.24%, which is greater than DHTAX's maximum drawdown of -51.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTTMX and DHTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTTMXDHTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.24%

-51.42%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-7.80%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.62%

-20.90%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-24.31%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-44.28%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-7.72%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.11%

-1.14%

Volatility

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio (GTTMX) is 3.30%, while Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund (DHTAX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that GTTMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTTMXDHTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.34%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

10.13%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

14.68%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.28%

20.88%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

21.96%

-1.48%

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTTMX has a 1.83% expense ratio, which is higher than DHTAX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTTMX vs. DHTAX - Dividend Comparison

GTTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.47%, more than DHTAX's 7.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHTAX
Diamond Hill All Cap Select Fund
7.57%8.20%6.66%0.28%4.08%13.72%0.28%1.93%11.56%0.00%1.27%3.32%
GTTMX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Total Market Equity Portfolio
16.47%18.85%14.45%5.83%0.40%17.50%11.58%5.95%9.88%3.00%0.55%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTTMX and DHTAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHTAX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to GTTMX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTTMX dropped -56.24% vs DHTAX's -51.42%.

GTTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTTMX and DHTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer