PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTSAX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTSAX achieves a 23.28% return, which is significantly higher than FECGX's 16.82% return.


GTSAX

1D
0.64%
1M
4.94%
YTD
23.28%
6M
19.48%
1Y
41.59%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
10.78%

FECGX

1D
-1.38%
1M
2.39%
YTD
16.82%
6M
13.67%
1Y
37.46%
3Y*
18.23%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
23.28%5.80%16.19%12.66%-35.61%5.71%57.23%2.94%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
16.82%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GTSAX and FECGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.95

The correlation between GTSAX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTSAX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTSAX
GTSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GTSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GTSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTSAXFECGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.54

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

9.15

+2.38

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTSAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTSAX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTSAXFECGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

1.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.24

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.38

+0.09

Drawdowns

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTSAX drawdown since its inception was -63.62%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTSAX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTSAXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.62%

-41.85%

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.42%

-14.81%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.24%

-28.45%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.85%

-40.34%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-1.38%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.94%

-15.76%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

4.10%

-0.44%

Volatility

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund (GTSAX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) at 6.62%. This indicates that GTSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTSAXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.83%

6.62%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.84%

15.82%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

21.40%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.57%

24.54%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.21%

27.19%

-2.98%

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTSAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTSAX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

GTSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than FECGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTSAX
Invesco Small Cap Growth Fund
8.47%10.45%0.00%0.00%3.60%38.91%13.85%8.96%9.76%9.23%9.35%10.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, GTSAX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GTSAX has higher volatility (7.83%) compared to FECGX (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTSAX dropped -63.62% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

GTSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTSAX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer