GTRAX vs. PRSNX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX).
GTRAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jul 6, 1986. PRSNX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 14, 2008.
Performance
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund | -1.49% | 10.63% | -0.37% | 8.37% | -22.39% | -6.36% | 9.79% | 14.99% | -1.88% | 13.25% |
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | -0.32% | 11.12% | 4.27% | 12.77% | -16.27% | 0.40% | 8.16% | 11.94% | 0.45% | 6.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTRAX achieves a -1.49% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, GTRAX has underperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.91% annualized return.
GTRAX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.97%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- -1.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
PRSNX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 3.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTRAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTRAX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank
GTRAX
PRSNX
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTRAX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 2.54 | -1.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 4.11 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.57 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 3.84 | -2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 14.13 | -9.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTRAX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.54 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.46 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.96 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.42 | -1.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTRAX and PRSNX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison
GTRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than PRSNX's 8.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund | 3.37% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.02% | 3.22% | 3.03% | 3.63% | 8.40% | 3.40% | 3.17% | 3.70% | 3.55% |
PRSNX T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 8.95% | 9.51% | 5.09% | 5.08% | 3.30% | 3.95% | 3.68% | 6.33% | 4.89% | 3.59% | 3.44% | 3.60% |
Drawdowns
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than PRSNX's maximum drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRAX and PRSNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTRAX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.63% | -19.70% | -13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -2.19% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.81% | -19.70% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.63% | -19.70% | -13.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.60% | -1.88% | -12.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -2.42% | -3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 0.60% | +0.56% |
Volatility
GTRAX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 1.15%. This indicates that GTRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTRAX | PRSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 1.15% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.37% | 2.10% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.33% | 3.43% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.42% | 4.27% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 4.11% | +2.13% |