GTRAX vs. PGKZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTRAX (PGIM Global Total Return Fund) and PGKZX (PGIM Jennison Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - GTRAX is a Global Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PGKZX is a Technology Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, GTRAX returned -1.94%/yr vs 19.67%/yr for PGKZX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTRAX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PGKZX.

Performance

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTRAX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than PGKZX's 24.27% return.

GTRAX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.03%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: 3.11%
• 3Y*: 5.27%
• 5Y*: -1.94%
• 10Y*: 1.48%

PGKZX

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 12.79%
• YTD: 24.27%
• 6M: 22.41%
• 1Y: 44.94%
• 3Y*: 35.24%
• 5Y*: 19.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund	0.03%	10.63%	-0.37%	8.37%	-22.39%	-6.36%	9.79%	14.99%	1.01%
PGKZX PGIM Jennison Technology Fund	24.27%	16.93%	43.15%	65.78%	-38.60%	15.27%	64.06%	33.96%	-8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GTRAX and PGKZX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018	0.20

The correlation between GTRAX and PGKZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GTRAX vs. PGKZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTRAX

GTRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9
GTRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
GTRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
GTRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GTRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GTRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

PGKZX

PGKZX Risk / Return Rank: 48
PGKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PGKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PGKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PGKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PGKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) and PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTRAX	PGKZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.18	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	2.81	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.37	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.81	2.77	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	8.57	-6.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTRAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the PGKZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTRAX and PGKZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTRAX	PGKZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	2.18	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	0.71	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.78	-0.53

Drawdowns

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum PGKZX drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTRAX and PGKZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTRAX	PGKZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.63%	-48.47%	+14.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-16.55%	+11.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.84%	-30.48%	+23.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.81%	-48.47%	+16.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.28%	-1.53%	-11.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-11.38%	+5.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.53%	5.34%	-3.81%

Volatility

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Global Total Return Fund (GTRAX) is 1.92%, while PGIM Jennison Technology Fund (PGKZX) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that GTRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGKZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTRAX	PGKZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	6.06%	-4.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.15%	16.56%	-12.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.35%	21.08%	-15.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.48%	28.06%	-21.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.25%	28.34%	-22.09%

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTRAX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than PGKZX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTRAX vs. PGKZX - Dividend Comparison

GTRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than PGKZX's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTRAX PGIM Global Total Return Fund	3.67%	3.67%	3.82%	3.02%	3.22%	3.03%	3.63%	8.40%	3.40%	3.17%	3.70%	3.55%
PGKZX PGIM Jennison Technology Fund	4.39%	5.45%	7.67%	0.00%	0.00%	9.73%	4.41%	0.04%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTRAX and PGKZX in my portfolio?

GTRAX and PGKZX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTRAX or PGKZX?

PGKZX has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to GTRAX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTRAX dropped -33.63% vs PGKZX's -48.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGKZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.