GTR vs. NVII

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GTR (WisdomTree Target Range Fund) and NVII (REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GTR returned 16.80% vs 24.97% for NVII. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for NVII.

Performance

GTR vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 10.62% return.

GTR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 5.92%
• YTD: 8.69%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 11.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVII

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 9.98%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 1Y: 24.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	8.69%	10.54%
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	10.62%	47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and NVII is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025	0.50

The correlation between GTR and NVII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GTR vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR

GTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 26
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTR	NVII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	0.69	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.14	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.14	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	1.35	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.06	2.93	+8.14

GTR vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the NVII Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and NVII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTR vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, which is greater than NVII's maximum drawdown of -18.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and NVII.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTR	NVII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-18.56%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-18.56%	+12.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-12.41%	+11.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-6.26%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	8.55%	-7.03%

Volatility

GTR vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is 2.10%, while REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that GTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTR	NVII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	10.47%	-8.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.03%	27.99%	-20.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.64%	36.33%	-26.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.83%	35.54%	-24.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.83%	35.54%	-24.71%

GTR vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than NVII's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTR vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, less than NVII's 57.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTR WisdomTree Target Range Fund	5.34%	5.74%	5.30%	2.85%	0.46%
NVII REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF	57.03%	29.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTR and NVII in my portfolio?

GTR and NVII have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTR or NVII?

NVII has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to GTR (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs NVII's -18.56%.

Which ETF is better, GTR or NVII?

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 24.97% vs 16.80% for GTR. On fees, GTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, GTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTR or NVII?

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 24.97% return vs 16.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTR or NVII?

GTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTR or NVII?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 57.03%, compared with 5.34% for GTR.

What is the main difference between GTR and NVII?

GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while NVII is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.99% for NVII.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.