PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTR vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTR vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTR achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 20.35% return.


GTR

1D
0.28%
1M
2.20%
YTD
8.44%
6M
8.61%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
12.84%
5Y*
10Y*

DXJ

1D
0.59%
1M
6.44%
YTD
20.35%
6M
23.80%
1Y
56.31%
3Y*
33.61%
5Y*
26.28%
10Y*
18.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTR vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
8.44%12.90%8.41%12.45%-19.07%3.77%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
20.35%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%3.01%

Correlation

The correlation between GTR and DXJ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021

0.61

The correlation between GTR and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

GTR vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GTR
DXJ

Technology

27.5%
12.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
18.3%

Industrials

12.1%
27.4%

Healthcare

9.8%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
15.6%

Communication Services

7.7%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.7%

Energy

4.2%
1.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
8.5%

Utilities

2.7%
0.1%

Real Estate

2.7%

-

Technology

GTR
27.5%
DXJ
12.9%

Financial Services

GTR
15.9%
DXJ
18.3%

Industrials

GTR
12.1%
DXJ
27.4%

Healthcare

GTR
9.8%
DXJ
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GTR
9.3%
DXJ
15.6%

Communication Services

GTR
7.7%
DXJ
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

GTR
4.4%
DXJ
4.7%

Energy

GTR
4.2%
DXJ
1.7%

Basic Materials

GTR
3.7%
DXJ
8.5%

Utilities

GTR
2.7%
DXJ
0.1%

Real Estate

GTR
2.7%
DXJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTR vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTR
GTR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTR vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTRDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.59

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.15

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

20.14

-7.08

GTR vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTR and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTRDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

3.25

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.43

+0.03

Drawdowns

GTR vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTR drawdown since its inception was -21.44%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTR and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTRDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.44%

-49.63%

+28.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-10.98%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-22.19%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-14.34%

+5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.80%

-1.30%

Volatility

GTR vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Target Range Fund (GTR) is 2.36%, while WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that GTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTRDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

3.40%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.88%

13.10%

-6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.45%

17.44%

-7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

18.96%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.86%

20.18%

-9.32%

GTR vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTR vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

GTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than DXJ's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.07%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
GTR
WisdomTree Target Range Fund
5.30%5.74%5.30%2.85%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTR and DXJ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DXJ has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to GTR (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTR dropped -21.44% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 3-year performance, DXJ leads with 33.61% vs 12.84% for GTR. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, GTR has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 33.61% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GTR.

GTR has the higher dividend yield at 5.30%, compared with 1.07% for DXJ.

GTR is categorized as Options Trading, while DXJ is Japan Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for GTR and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTR and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer