GTPE vs. COPY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GTPE (Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF) and COPY (Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF) are both Global Equities funds. GTPE is passively managed, while COPY is actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTPE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for COPY.

Performance

GTPE vs. COPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF (COPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTPE achieves a 16.12% return, which is significantly lower than COPY's 18.84% return.

GTPE

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 13.22%
• YTD: 16.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COPY

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: 2.00%
• 6M: 13.89%
• YTD: 18.84%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTPE vs. COPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF	16.12%	2.96%
COPY Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF	18.84%	5.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GTPE and COPY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

GTPE vs. COPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTPE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COPY

COPY Risk / Return Rank: 86
COPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
COPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
COPY Omega Ratio Rank: 87
COPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COPY Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTPE vs. COPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF (GTPE) and Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF (COPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTPE	COPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.14	—

Drawdowns

GTPE vs. COPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTPE drawdown since its inception was -8.91%, smaller than the maximum COPY drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTPE and COPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTPE	COPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-14.05%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	0.00%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-1.52%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.36%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTPE	COPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.98%	13.12%	+4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.98%	16.98%	+1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.98%	16.98%	+1.00%

GTPE vs. COPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTPE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than COPY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTPE vs. COPY - Dividend Comparison

GTPE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.

Position	TTM	2025
COPY Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF	0.80%	0.95%
GTPE Goldman Sachs MSCI World Private Equity Return Tracker ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTPE and COPY in my portfolio?

GTPE and COPY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GTPE or COPY?

On fees, GTPE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTPE or COPY?

GTPE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for COPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTPE or COPY?

COPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for GTPE.

What is the main difference between GTPE and COPY?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Tweedy, Browne. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GTPE and 0.80% for COPY.