PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOS vs. VGSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOS vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOS achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than VGSH's 0.36% return.


GTOS

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
10Y*

VGSH

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
4.11%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOS vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GTOS
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
0.92%6.23%5.35%5.17%0.01%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.36%5.07%4.00%4.31%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOS and VGSH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022

0.80

The correlation between GTOS and VGSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOS vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOS
GTOS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GTOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTOS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GTOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOS vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTOSVGSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.53

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.68

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.07

14.60

+5.47

GTOS vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTOS Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTOS and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTOSVGSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

2.53

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.75

1.01

+1.74

Drawdowns

GTOS vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOS drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum VGSH drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOS and VGSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOSVGSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-5.70%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.12%

-0.88%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.12%

-0.97%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.41%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-0.60%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.22%

+0.02%

Volatility

GTOS vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) have volatilities of 0.35% and 0.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOSVGSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

0.36%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.09%

0.90%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

1.29%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.85%

1.97%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.85%

1.58%

+0.27%

GTOS vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTOS vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

GTOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than VGSH's 3.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTOS
Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF
4.59%4.89%5.50%5.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.88%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOS and VGSH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGSH has higher volatility (0.36%) compared to GTOS (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOS dropped -1.83% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

On 3-year performance, GTOS leads with 5.60% vs 4.11% for VGSH. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GTOS has performed better with a 5.60% return vs 4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GTOS.

GTOS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 3.88% for VGSH.

GTOS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while VGSH is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GTOS and 0.03% for VGSH.

GTOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOS and VGSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer