GTOS vs. SPHD

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

GTOS (Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTOS is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. GTOS is actively managed, while SPHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTOS returned 5.60%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

GTOS vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOS achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 6.80% return.

GTOS

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 6M: 1.45%
• 1Y: 4.87%
• 3Y*: 5.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPHD

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 11.80%
• 3Y*: 12.05%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 7.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOS vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
GTOS Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF	0.92%	6.23%	5.35%	5.17%	0.01%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	6.80%	3.41%	18.08%	1.32%	-0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOS and SPHD is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022	0.22

Return for Risk

GTOS vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOS

GTOS Risk / Return Rank: 93
GTOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GTOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GTOS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
GTOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
GTOS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SPHD

SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 30
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 27
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOS vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTOS	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.53	1.07	+2.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.55	1.62	+3.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.82	1.18	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	1.62	+2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.07	4.02	+16.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTOS vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTOS Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTOS and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTOS	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53	1.07	+2.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.75	0.59	+2.16

Drawdowns

GTOS vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOS drawdown since its inception was -1.83%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOS and SPHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTOS	SPHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.83%	-41.39%	+39.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.12%	-7.33%	+6.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.12%	-13.29%	+12.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-3.18%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-4.70%	+4.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.24%	2.94%	-2.70%

Volatility

GTOS vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF (GTOS) is 0.35%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that GTOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTOS	SPHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.35%	3.39%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.09%	7.66%	-6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39%	11.12%	-9.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.85%	14.17%	-12.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.85%	17.65%	-15.80%

GTOS vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTOS and SPHD have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

GTOS vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

GTOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than SPHD's 4.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTOS Invesco Short Duration Total Return Bond ETF	4.59%	4.89%	5.50%	5.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.52%	4.02%	3.41%	4.48%	3.89%	3.45%	4.89%	4.07%	4.40%	3.14%	3.83%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTOS and SPHD in my portfolio?

GTOS and SPHD have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTOS or SPHD?

SPHD has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to GTOS (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOS dropped -1.83% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

Which ETF is better, GTOS or SPHD?

On 3-year performance, SPHD leads with 12.05% vs 5.60% for GTOS. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, GTOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTOS or SPHD?

Over the 3-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 12.05% return vs 5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTOS or SPHD?

GTOS and SPHD have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTOS or SPHD?

GTOS has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.52% for SPHD.

What is the main difference between GTOS and SPHD?

GTOS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPHD is Dividend.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.