PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTOH vs. COMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTOH vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOH achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 23.11% return.


GTOH

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.69%
1Y
6.07%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
10Y*

COMT

1D
1.79%
1M
-10.98%
YTD
23.11%
6M
22.05%
1Y
27.86%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOH vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GTOH
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.83%7.91%6.57%10.54%-1.34%
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
23.11%6.07%5.96%-6.56%5.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOH and COMT is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2022

0.06

The correlation between GTOH and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTOH vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTOH
GTOH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GTOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTOH Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GTOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTOH Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

COMT
COMT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOH vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTOHCOMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.59

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.00

7.12

+5.88

GTOH vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTOH Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTOH and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTOH vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOH drawdown since its inception was -4.77%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOH and COMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTOHCOMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-51.89%

+47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-17.57%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.13%

-17.57%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-16.10%

+15.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-24.00%

+23.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.47%

3.92%

-3.45%

Volatility

GTOH vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF (GTOH) is 0.71%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that GTOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTOHCOMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

5.77%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

19.43%

-17.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

21.19%

-18.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.45%

21.17%

-16.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.45%

18.88%

-14.43%

GTOH vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTOH and COMT have an expense ratio of 0.48%.


Dividends

GTOH vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

GTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%, less than COMT's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COMT
iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF
6.29%7.74%4.90%5.19%29.79%17.79%0.36%2.61%11.65%5.16%0.52%1.44%
GTOH
Invesco Short Duration High Yield ETF
6.20%6.57%6.81%6.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTOH and COMT have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COMT has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to GTOH (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTOH dropped -4.77% vs COMT's -51.89%.

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 11.69% vs 7.97% for GTOH. Both ETFs have the same 0.48% expense ratio. On volatility, GTOH has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GTOH and COMT have the same expense ratio: 0.48% per year.

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 6.29%, compared with 6.20% for GTOH.

GTOH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

GTOH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTOH and COMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer