GTOC vs. IBGA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GTOC (Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF) and IBGA (iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. GTOC is actively managed, while IBGA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTOC charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBGA.

Performance

GTOC vs. IBGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTOC achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly higher than IBGA's -0.37% return.

GTOC

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBGA

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: -0.37%
• 6M: -1.42%
• 1Y: 5.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTOC vs. IBGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	0.39%	3.52%
IBGA iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF	-0.37%	4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GTOC and IBGA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

GTOC vs. IBGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBGA

IBGA Risk / Return Rank: 20
IBGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
IBGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
IBGA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
IBGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
IBGA Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTOC vs. IBGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF (IBGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTOC	IBGA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.22	+1.05

Drawdowns

GTOC vs. IBGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTOC drawdown since its inception was -2.70%, smaller than the maximum IBGA drawdown of -11.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTOC and IBGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTOC	IBGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-11.69%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.52%	-4.67%	+3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.66%	-5.05%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GTOC	IBGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.62%	8.21%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.62%	9.86%	-6.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.62%	9.86%	-6.24%

GTOC vs. IBGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTOC has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than IBGA's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GTOC vs. IBGA - Dividend Comparison

GTOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than IBGA's 4.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GTOC Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	1.88%	0.00%
IBGA iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Treasury ETF	4.66%	4.49%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTOC and IBGA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, GTOC and IBGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GTOC or IBGA?

On fees, IBGA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTOC or IBGA?

IBGA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for GTOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTOC or IBGA?

IBGA has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 3.64% for GTOC.

What is the main difference between GTOC and IBGA?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for GTOC and 0.07% for IBGA.