PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTLLX vs. VIGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLLX achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly higher than VIGAX's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLLX has underperformed VIGAX with an annualized return of 16.67%, while VIGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.39% annualized return.


GTLLX

1D
1.06%
1M
13.54%
YTD
21.72%
6M
22.60%
1Y
39.47%
3Y*
25.88%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
16.67%

VIGAX

1D
-0.28%
1M
7.54%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.11%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
26.45%
5Y*
15.71%
10Y*
18.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
21.72%17.44%20.71%27.10%-21.69%32.91%18.80%34.86%-5.23%27.83%
VIGAX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
10.82%19.43%32.67%46.76%-33.14%27.26%40.18%37.23%-3.35%27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLLX and VIGAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2005

0.94

The correlation between GTLLX and VIGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTLLX vs. VIGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLLX
GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VIGAX
VIGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VIGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VIGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Vanguard Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTLLXVIGAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.92

+0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.29

2.59

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.33

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.84

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.80

6.49

+9.31

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the VIGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLLX and VIGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTLLXVIGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.92

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.71

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.86

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.48

+0.07

Drawdowns

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLLX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than VIGAX's maximum drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLLX and VIGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTLLXVIGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.32%

-50.66%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-16.51%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.54%

-23.04%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-35.63%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.54%

-35.63%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.28%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.58%

-11.96%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

4.68%

-2.07%

Volatility

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares (VIGAX) at 3.62%. This indicates that GTLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTLLXVIGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

3.62%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

12.10%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

15.88%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.00%

22.35%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

21.59%

+3.41%

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLLX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VIGAX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTLLX vs. VIGAX - Dividend Comparison

GTLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, more than VIGAX's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
12.59%15.33%40.42%4.91%7.93%20.20%15.12%14.10%16.97%2.29%0.58%0.61%
VIGAX
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.36%0.40%0.46%0.57%0.69%0.47%0.66%0.94%1.31%1.14%1.39%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTLLX and VIGAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLLX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VIGAX (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLLX dropped -54.32% vs VIGAX's -50.66%.

GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTLLX and VIGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer