GTLLX vs. PARWX
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX).
GTLLX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Feb 27, 2004. PARWX is managed by Parnassus. It was launched on Apr 29, 2005.
Performance
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | -3.91% | 17.44% | 20.71% | 27.10% | -21.69% | 32.91% | 18.80% | 34.86% | -5.23% | 27.83% |
PARWX Parnassus Endeavor Fund | -1.56% | 19.07% | 12.03% | 13.67% | -13.71% | 31.09% | 27.42% | 33.28% | -13.58% | 19.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTLLX achieves a -3.91% return, which is significantly lower than PARWX's -1.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTLLX having a 13.87% annualized return and PARWX not far behind at 13.56%.
GTLLX
- 1D
- 3.87%
- 1M
- -4.30%
- YTD
- -3.91%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 20.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
PARWX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 19.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTLLX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PARWX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTLLX vs. PARWX — Risk / Return Rank
GTLLX
PARWX
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTLLX | PARWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.67 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.50 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | 6.63 | -1.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTLLX | PARWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.39 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTLLX and PARWX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Dividend Comparison
GTLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than PARWX's 12.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 15.95% | 15.33% | 40.42% | 4.91% | 7.93% | 20.20% | 15.12% | 14.10% | 16.97% | 2.29% | 0.58% | 0.61% |
PARWX Parnassus Endeavor Fund | 12.34% | 12.14% | 8.25% | 1.76% | 2.97% | 16.75% | 0.70% | 0.79% | 12.34% | 6.32% | 3.27% | 10.26% |
Drawdowns
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTLLX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, which is greater than PARWX's maximum drawdown of -47.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLLX and PARWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTLLX | PARWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.32% | -47.76% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -12.20% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.54% | -32.27% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.54% | -37.21% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.87% | -6.59% | -14.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -6.93% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.76% | +0.44% |
Volatility
GTLLX vs. PARWX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Parnassus Endeavor Fund (PARWX) at 4.93%. This indicates that GTLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PARWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTLLX | PARWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 4.93% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 9.08% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 17.34% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.90% | 18.76% | +10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 21.06% | +3.86% |