GTLLX vs. BPTRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GTLLX (Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio) and BPTRX (Baron Partners Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, GTLLX returned 17.08%/yr vs 25.15%/yr for BPTRX. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTLLX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for BPTRX.

Performance

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTLLX achieves a 21.50% return, which is significantly higher than BPTRX's 4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GTLLX has underperformed BPTRX with an annualized return of 17.08%, while BPTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.15% annualized return.

GTLLX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 7.33%
• YTD: 21.50%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 38.11%
• 3Y*: 25.35%
• 5Y*: 14.59%
• 10Y*: 17.08%

BPTRX

• 1D: -6.94%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: 37.57%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 25.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	21.50%	17.44%	20.71%	27.10%	-21.69%	32.91%	18.80%	34.86%	-5.23%	27.83%
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund	4.67%	24.54%	32.75%	43.09%	-42.53%	31.35%	148.81%	44.99%	-2.01%	31.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GTLLX and BPTRX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GTLLX and BPTRX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GTLLX vs. BPTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTLLX

GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 71
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BPTRX

BPTRX Risk / Return Rank: 52
BPTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
BPTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BPTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BPTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BPTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) and Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTLLX	BPTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.43	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.80	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.34	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	3.81	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.94	9.56	+5.38

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTLLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the BPTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTLLX and BPTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTLLX drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum BPTRX drawdown of -64.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTLLX and BPTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTLLX	BPTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.32%	-64.11%	+9.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.76%	-11.15%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.54%	-33.34%	-8.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.54%	-49.87%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.54%	-51.26%	+9.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.13%	-11.15%	+10.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.57%	-13.77%	+5.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	4.44%	-1.77%

Volatility

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) is 7.97%, while Baron Partners Fund (BPTRX) has a volatility of 13.63%. This indicates that GTLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTLLX	BPTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.97%	13.63%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.72%	17.53%	-2.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	29.86%	-11.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.13%	34.10%	-4.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.09%	32.94%	-7.85%

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTLLX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BPTRX's 1.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTLLX vs. BPTRX - Dividend Comparison

GTLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.62%, more than BPTRX's 3.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPTRX Baron Partners Fund	3.21%	3.36%	0.76%	0.00%	3.19%	7.72%	3.67%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.35%
GTLLX Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio	12.62%	15.33%	40.42%	4.91%	7.93%	20.20%	15.12%	14.10%	16.97%	2.29%	0.58%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTLLX and BPTRX in my portfolio?

GTLLX and BPTRX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTLLX or BPTRX?

BPTRX has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to GTLLX (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTLLX dropped -54.32% vs BPTRX's -64.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.