GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE
GTIL.DE (Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds. GTIL.DE is actively managed, while CSY9.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, GTIL.DE returned 23.20% vs 3.39% for CSY9.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTIL.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.
Performance
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIL.DE achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.
GTIL.DE
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GTIL.DE Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C | 8.33% | 7.95% | -2.33% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 3.19% | -0.67% | -3.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CSY9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GTIL.DE
CSY9.DE
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIL.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.07 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 0.69 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 1.54 | +8.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIL.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.38 | +1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIL.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIL.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIL.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.90% | -13.92% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -4.48% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.72% | +2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.70% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.00% | +0.32% |
Volatility
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that GTIL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTIL.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 2.09% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 5.48% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 8.07% | +3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 12.03% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 11.91% | +3.60% |
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIL.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTIL.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTIL.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTIL.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTIL.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTIL.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
Find the right allocation for GTIL.DE and CSY9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer