GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE
GTIL.DE (Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C) and CBUH.DE (iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GTIL.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while CBUH.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. GTIL.DE is actively managed, while CBUH.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, GTIL.DE returned 23.20% vs 31.50% for CBUH.DE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GTIL.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CBUH.DE.
Performance
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIL.DE achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly lower than CBUH.DE's 22.41% return.
GTIL.DE
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUH.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 22.41%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GTIL.DE Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C | 8.33% | 7.95% | -2.33% |
CBUH.DE iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 22.41% | 7.97% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CBUH.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CBUH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GTIL.DE
CBUH.DE
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIL.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 3.38 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 13.99 | -3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIL.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.99 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.64 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIL.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, roughly equal to the maximum CBUH.DE drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIL.DE and CBUH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIL.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.90% | -22.61% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -9.39% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -8.55% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.27% | +0.05% |
Volatility
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) is 2.86%, while iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that GTIL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTIL.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 4.80% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 13.32% | -5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 15.96% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.91% | -1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 16.91% | -1.40% |
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIL.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTIL.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTIL.DE nor CBUH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTIL.DE and CBUH.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBUH.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBUH.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GTIL.DE.
GTIL.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUH.DE is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTIL.DE and 0.30% for CBUH.DE.
Find the right allocation for GTIL.DE and CBUH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer