GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE
GTIL.DE (Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C) and CBUX.DE (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - GTIL.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Xtrackers, while CBUX.DE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. GTIL.DE is actively managed, while CBUX.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, GTIL.DE returned 23.20% vs 13.13% for CBUX.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTIL.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CBUX.DE.
Performance
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTIL.DE achieves a 8.33% return, which is significantly lower than CBUX.DE's 10.28% return.
GTIL.DE
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUX.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GTIL.DE Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C | 8.33% | 7.95% | -2.33% |
CBUX.DE iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.28% | 0.69% | -3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CBUX.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2024 | 0.34 |
The correlation between GTIL.DE and CBUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
GTIL.DE
CBUX.DE
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTIL.DE | CBUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.91 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 6.42 | +3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTIL.DE | CBUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.18 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.60 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTIL.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, which is greater than CBUX.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTIL.DE and CBUX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTIL.DE | CBUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.90% | -14.94% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.69% | -4.22% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.33% | +3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -3.81% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.91% | +0.41% |
Volatility
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers World Green Tech Innovators UCITS ETF 1C (GTIL.DE) is 2.86%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CBUX.DE) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that GTIL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTIL.DE | CBUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.86% | 3.92% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 8.63% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 10.36% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 11.93% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 11.93% | +3.58% |
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTIL.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUX.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTIL.DE vs. CBUX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither GTIL.DE nor CBUX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GTIL.DE and CBUX.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GTIL.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GTIL.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CBUX.DE.
GTIL.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUX.DE is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for GTIL.DE and 0.65% for CBUX.DE.
Find the right allocation for GTIL.DE and CBUX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer