PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTES vs. ALNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GTES vs. ALNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTES achieves a 23.47% return, which is significantly lower than ALNT's 59.10% return.


GTES

1D
2.55%
1M
10.18%
YTD
23.47%
6M
19.25%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
28.65%
5Y*
7.64%
10Y*

ALNT

1D
2.82%
1M
12.05%
YTD
59.10%
6M
57.84%
1Y
182.22%
3Y*
34.76%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
19.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTES vs. ALNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTES
Gates Industrial Corporation plc
23.47%4.38%53.28%17.62%-28.28%24.69%-7.27%3.93%-28.43%
ALNT
Allient Inc.
59.10%122.15%-19.26%-12.91%-4.29%7.40%5.74%8.88%27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between GTES and ALNT is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018

0.47

The correlation between GTES and ALNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

GTES:

$1.29

ALNT:

$1.42

PE Ratio

GTES:

20.61

ALNT:

60.19

PEG Ratio

GTES:

17.91

ALNT:

12.49

PS Ratio

GTES:

1.49

ALNT:

2.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

GTES:

$3.45B

ALNT:

$560.59M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GTES:

$1.38B

ALNT:

$178.09M

EBITDA (TTM)

GTES:

$645.40M

ALNT:

$70.63M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTES vs. ALNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTES
GTES Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTES Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTES Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ALNT
ALNT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ALNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALNT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ALNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALNT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTES vs. ALNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) and Allient Inc. (ALNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTESALNTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

3.61

-2.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.18

3.72

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.48

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

8.30

-7.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

28.19

-25.77

GTES vs. ALNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTES Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the ALNT Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTES and ALNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTESALNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

3.61

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.39

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.13

-0.03

Drawdowns

GTES vs. ALNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTES drawdown since its inception was -70.06%, smaller than the maximum ALNT drawdown of -92.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTES and ALNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTESALNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.06%

-92.45%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.99%

-21.88%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.82%

-57.27%

+23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.40%

-61.88%

+13.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

0.00%

-5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.83%

-47.52%

+20.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.48%

6.44%

+4.04%

Volatility

GTES vs. ALNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) is 11.28%, while Allient Inc. (ALNT) has a volatility of 24.34%. This indicates that GTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTESALNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

24.34%

-13.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.15%

38.91%

-9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

50.77%

-13.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.46%

47.35%

-12.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.40%

47.97%

-7.57%

Dividends

GTES vs. ALNT - Dividend Comparison

GTES has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALNT
Allient Inc.
0.15%0.22%0.49%0.38%0.29%0.26%0.23%0.25%0.26%0.30%0.47%0.38%
GTES
Gates Industrial Corporation plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GTES vs. ALNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gates Industrial Corporation plc and Allient Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
851.10M
138.92M
(GTES) Total Revenue
(ALNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GTES vs. ALNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gates Industrial Corporation plc and Allient Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
39.7%
32.7%
Portfolio components
GTES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gates Industrial Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 338.00M and revenue of 851.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

ALNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allient Inc. reported a gross profit of 45.38M and revenue of 138.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

GTES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gates Industrial Corporation plc reported an operating income of 109.90M and revenue of 851.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

ALNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allient Inc. reported an operating income of 9.32M and revenue of 138.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

GTES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gates Industrial Corporation plc reported a net income of 59.70M and revenue of 851.10M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

ALNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allient Inc. reported a net income of 5.36M and revenue of 138.92M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GTES and ALNT have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALNT has higher volatility (24.34%) compared to GTES (11.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTES dropped -70.06% vs ALNT's -92.45%.

ALNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTES and ALNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer