ALNT vs. ALMU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Allient Inc. (ALNT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU).

Performance

ALNT vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allient Inc. (ALNT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALNT vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALNT Allient Inc.	9.99%	122.15%	-19.26%	-12.91%	-2.55%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	-23.76%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%

Fundamentals

EPS ALNT : $1.11 ALMU : -$0.17
PS Ratio ALNT : 1.86 ALMU : 41.59
Total Revenue (TTM) ALNT : $533.13M ALMU : $5.23M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALNT : $170.54M ALMU : $2.62M
EBITDA (TTM) ALNT : $71.10M ALMU : -$5.05M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALNT achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than ALMU's -23.76% return.

ALNT

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 6M: 32.19%
• 1Y: 169.58%
• 3Y*: 15.64%
• 5Y*: 11.53%
• 10Y*: 17.20%

ALMU

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -15.38%
• YTD: -23.76%
• 6M: -18.70%
• 1Y: 81.55%
• 3Y*: 53.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALNT vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALNT

ALNT Risk / Return Rank: 97
ALNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ALNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ALNT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
ALNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ALNT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 70
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALNT vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allient Inc. (ALNT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.37	0.72	+2.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.94	1.71	+2.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.21	+0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.20	1.72	+9.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	32.75	3.21	+29.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALNT vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALNT Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALNT and ALMU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37	0.72	+2.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.63	-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between ALNT and ALMU is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALNT vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

ALNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALNT Allient Inc.	0.20%	0.22%	0.49%	0.38%	0.29%	0.26%	0.23%	0.25%	0.26%	0.30%	0.47%	0.38%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ALNT vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALNT drawdown since its inception was -92.45%, which is greater than ALMU's maximum drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALNT and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.45%	-50.08%	-42.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.59%	-50.08%	+35.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.16%	-45.55%	+31.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.72%	-23.46%	-24.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.99%	26.89%	-21.90%

Volatility

ALNT vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allient Inc. (ALNT) is 18.04%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 20.72%. This indicates that ALNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.04%	20.72%	-2.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.57%	66.80%	-31.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.73%	114.06%	-63.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.15%	119.28%	-73.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.49%	119.28%	-71.79%

Financials