ALNT vs. ALMU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ALNT (Allient Inc.) and ALMU (Aeluma, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ALNT in Electronic Components, ALMU in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, ALNT returned 35.47%/yr vs 101.01%/yr for ALMU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ALNT vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allient Inc. (ALNT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALNT achieves a 61.65% return, which is significantly higher than ALMU's 56.09% return.

ALNT

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 14.80%
• YTD: 61.65%
• 6M: 61.56%
• 1Y: 175.58%
• 3Y*: 35.47%
• 5Y*: 18.52%
• 10Y*: 19.39%

ALMU

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 16.72%
• YTD: 56.09%
• 6M: 75.45%
• 1Y: 40.31%
• 3Y*: 101.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALNT vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ALNT Allient Inc.	61.65%	122.15%	-19.26%	-12.91%	-2.55%
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	56.09%	124.44%	163.79%	38.10%	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ALNT and ALMU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALNT : $1.46B ALMU : $465.10M
EPS ALNT : $1.42 ALMU : -$0.36
PS Ratio ALNT : 2.60 ALMU : 86.65
PB Ratio ALNT : 4.79 ALMU : 11.60
Total Revenue (TTM) ALNT : $560.59M ALMU : $5.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALNT : $178.09M ALMU : $2.17M
EBITDA (TTM) ALNT : $70.63M ALMU : -$6.01M

Return for Risk

ALNT vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALNT

ALNT Risk / Return Rank: 95
ALNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ALNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ALNT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ALNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ALNT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ALMU

ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 58
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALNT vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allient Inc. (ALNT) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.49	0.31	+3.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	1.44	+2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.17	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.07	0.73	+7.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	27.36	1.38	+25.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALNT vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALNT Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALNT and ALMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.49	0.31	+3.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.88	-0.75

Drawdowns

ALNT vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALNT drawdown since its inception was -92.45%, which is greater than ALMU's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALNT and ALMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.45%	-55.37%	-37.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.88%	-55.37%	+33.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.27%	-55.37%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.89%	+14.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.51%	-23.52%	-23.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.44%	29.36%	-22.92%

Volatility

ALNT vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allient Inc. (ALNT) is 24.32%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 50.01%. This indicates that ALNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALNT	ALMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.32%	50.01%	-25.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.89%	92.99%	-54.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.78%	129.69%	-78.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.36%	123.66%	-76.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.97%	123.66%	-75.69%

Dividends

ALNT vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

ALNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while ALMU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALMU Aeluma, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ALNT Allient Inc.	0.15%	0.22%	0.49%	0.38%	0.29%	0.26%	0.23%	0.25%	0.26%	0.30%	0.47%	0.38%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ALNT and ALMU in my portfolio?

ALNT and ALMU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ALNT or ALMU?

ALMU has higher volatility (50.01%) compared to ALNT (24.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALNT dropped -92.45% vs ALMU's -55.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.