GTEK vs. OILK
GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. GTEK is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTEK returned 34.69%/yr vs 18.39%/yr for OILK. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
GTEK vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 61.09% return.
GTEK
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 13.61%
- YTD
- 53.34%
- 6M
- 54.05%
- 1Y
- 79.94%
- 3Y*
- 34.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 61.09%
- 6M
- 56.40%
- 1Y
- 56.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.39%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- —
GTEK vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 53.34% | 23.68% | 15.94% | 33.58% | -46.73% | -3.14% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 61.09% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 7.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTEK and OILK is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between GTEK and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GTEK vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GTEK
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
GTEK
OILK
-
Industrials
GTEK
OILK
-
Communication Services
GTEK
OILK
-
Basic Materials
GTEK
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
GTEK
OILK
Real Estate
GTEK
OILK
-
Healthcare
GTEK
OILK
-
Financial Services
GTEK
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
GTEK
-
OILK
-
Energy
GTEK
-
OILK
-
Utilities
GTEK
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTEK vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
GTEK
OILK
GTEK vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTEK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.22 | 3.30 | +3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.44 | 6.67 | +16.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTEK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 1.99 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.11 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
GTEK vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTEK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.77% | -83.76% | +29.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -17.35% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.49% | -23.42% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -5.49% | +5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -32.60% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 8.57% | -5.15% |
Volatility
GTEK vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is 9.28%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that GTEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTEK | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 10.52% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 23.32% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 28.82% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 30.13% | -1.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 35.97% | -7.69% |
GTEK vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTEK vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.34% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTEK and OILK have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to GTEK (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 34.69% vs 18.39% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GTEK has been the lower-risk option at 9.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 34.69% return vs 18.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.
GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.68% for OILK.
GTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTEK and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer