GTEK vs. GBIL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GTEK (Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while GBIL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. GTEK is actively managed, while GBIL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GTEK returned 34.69%/yr vs 4.64%/yr for GBIL. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTEK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

GTEK vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTEK achieves a 53.34% return, which is significantly higher than GBIL's 1.44% return.

GTEK

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 13.61%
• YTD: 53.34%
• 6M: 54.05%
• 1Y: 79.94%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.89%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTEK vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	53.34%	23.68%	15.94%	33.58%	-46.73%	-3.14%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.44%	4.12%	5.24%	4.91%	1.05%	-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GTEK and GBIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021	0.05

Return for Risk

GTEK vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTEK

GTEK Risk / Return Rank: 89
GTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
GTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
GTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 92

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTEK vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GTEK	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	16.89	-13.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	102.35	-98.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	39.22	-37.73
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.22	195.39	-188.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.44	1,656.50	-1,633.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GTEK vs. GBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTEK Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is lower than the GBIL Sharpe Ratio of 16.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTEK and GBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GTEK	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	16.89	-13.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	4.88	-4.55

Drawdowns

GTEK vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTEK drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTEK and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTEK	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-0.76%	-53.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	-0.02%	-11.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.49%	-0.76%	-26.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	0.00%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-0.04%	-27.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	0.00%	+3.42%

Volatility

GTEK vs. GBIL - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL) at 0.04%. This indicates that GTEK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTEK	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	0.04%	+9.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.75%	0.14%	+21.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	0.23%	+25.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.28%	0.58%	+27.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.28%	0.47%	+27.81%

GTEK vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTEK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTEK vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

GTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.74%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
GTEK Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTEK and GBIL in my portfolio?

GTEK and GBIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTEK or GBIL?

GTEK has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to GBIL (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTEK dropped -53.77% vs GBIL's -0.76%.

Which ETF is better, GTEK or GBIL?

On 3-year performance, GTEK leads with 34.69% vs 4.64% for GBIL. On fees, GBIL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, GBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GTEK or GBIL?

Over the 3-year period, GTEK has performed better with a 34.69% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GTEK or GBIL?

GBIL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GTEK or GBIL?

GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.00% for GTEK.

What is the main difference between GTEK and GBIL?

GTEK is categorized as Technology Equities, while GBIL is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GTEK and 0.12% for GBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.89 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.