GTDDX vs. SAEMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GTDDX (Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd) and SAEMX (SA Emerging Markets Value Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, GTDDX returned 10.50%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for SAEMX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GTDDX charges 1.39%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for SAEMX.

Performance

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTDDX achieves a 48.50% return, which is significantly higher than SAEMX's 27.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTDDX having a 10.50% annualized return and SAEMX not far ahead at 10.66%.

GTDDX

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 10.82%
• YTD: 48.50%
• 6M: 51.58%
• 1Y: 78.23%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

SAEMX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.40%
• YTD: 27.11%
• 6M: 28.56%
• 1Y: 49.12%
• 3Y*: 23.15%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd	48.50%	29.88%	-0.66%	8.82%	-17.70%	-7.00%	17.19%	29.99%	-18.77%	30.34%
SAEMX SA Emerging Markets Value Fund	27.11%	29.21%	5.47%	15.72%	-11.61%	10.51%	0.88%	8.05%	-12.11%	31.24%

Correlation

The correlation between GTDDX and SAEMX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between GTDDX and SAEMX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GTDDX vs. SAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTDDX

GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 95
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SAEMX

SAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 89
SAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GTDDX	SAEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.72	3.08	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	3.90	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.56	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.51	4.30	+1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.80	15.53	+5.28

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTDDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.72, which is comparable to the SAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTDDX and SAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTDDX drawdown since its inception was -62.89%, roughly equal to the maximum SAEMX drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTDDX and SAEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GTDDX	SAEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.89%	-63.08%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.49%	-12.22%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.08%	-17.80%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.93%	-25.12%	-11.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.58%	-49.23%	+9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-0.75%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.72%	-17.17%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.24%	+0.58%

Volatility

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) at 7.35%. This indicates that GTDDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GTDDX	SAEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.57%	7.35%	+4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.24%	14.50%	+4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.49%	17.09%	+4.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.93%	15.17%	+1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	15.60%	+1.55%

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTDDX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SAEMX's 1.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GTDDX vs. SAEMX - Dividend Comparison

GTDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.23%, more than SAEMX's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GTDDX Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd	14.23%	21.13%	1.16%	1.51%	1.17%	4.46%	5.05%	1.49%	1.53%	0.71%	0.86%	0.99%
SAEMX SA Emerging Markets Value Fund	2.70%	3.43%	4.37%	4.07%	3.54%	2.86%	1.76%	2.18%	1.78%	1.28%	1.23%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GTDDX and SAEMX in my portfolio?

GTDDX and SAEMX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GTDDX or SAEMX?

GTDDX has higher volatility (11.57%) compared to SAEMX (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTDDX dropped -62.89% vs SAEMX's -63.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.72 vs 3.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.