PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAEMX vs. SAMKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) and SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEMX achieves a 27.19% return, which is significantly higher than SAMKX's 9.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SAEMX has underperformed SAMKX with an annualized return of 10.43%, while SAMKX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


SAEMX

1D
0.38%
1M
5.47%
YTD
27.19%
6M
28.85%
1Y
47.33%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
10.43%

SAMKX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
9.47%
6M
8.92%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
14.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
27.19%29.21%5.47%15.72%-11.61%10.51%0.88%8.05%-12.11%31.24%
SAMKX
SA U.S. Core Market Fund
9.47%15.80%22.80%25.81%-18.91%25.66%18.88%30.56%-4.69%22.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEMX and SAMKX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.38

The correlation between SAEMX and SAMKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAEMX vs. SAMKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAEMX
SAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SAMKX
SAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) and SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAEMXSAMKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.41

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

3.16

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

13.98

+1.63

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the SAMKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEMX and SAMKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEMX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, which is greater than SAMKX's maximum drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEMX and SAMKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAEMXSAMKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.08%

-33.77%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-8.75%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-19.29%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-24.88%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.23%

-33.77%

-15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-1.11%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-3.92%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

1.91%

+1.33%

Volatility

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Volatility Comparison

SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX) at 4.44%. This indicates that SAEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAEMXSAMKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

4.44%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.51%

9.41%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

12.09%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

16.93%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.61%

17.57%

-1.96%

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAEMX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SAMKX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAEMX vs. SAMKX - Dividend Comparison

SAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than SAMKX's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
2.70%3.43%4.37%4.07%3.54%2.86%1.76%2.18%1.78%1.28%1.23%1.25%
SAMKX
SA U.S. Core Market Fund
0.60%0.66%0.69%0.86%5.83%7.72%8.08%12.72%6.46%4.09%6.20%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAEMX and SAMKX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAEMX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SAMKX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAEMX dropped -63.08% vs SAMKX's -33.77%.

SAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAEMX and SAMKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer