GTCIX vs. PRPFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX).
GTCIX is managed by Glenmede. It was launched on Nov 16, 1988. PRPFX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Nov 30, 1982.
Performance
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTCIX Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio | 1.90% | 39.90% | 8.60% | 19.16% | -11.88% | 12.56% | 1.86% | 18.00% | -16.26% | 22.46% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 2.72% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 11.96% | -5.48% | 10.87% | 18.80% | 19.20% | -7.02% | 11.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTCIX achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than PRPFX's 2.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GTCIX has underperformed PRPFX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while PRPFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.84% annualized return.
GTCIX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -9.46%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -7.34%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTCIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GTCIX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank
GTCIX
PRPFX
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GTCIX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.86 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 2.31 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 3.07 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 11.17 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GTCIX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.86 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 1.11 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 1.03 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.80 | -0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between GTCIX and PRPFX is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison
GTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than PRPFX's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTCIX Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio | 4.42% | 4.50% | 9.25% | 2.75% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 1.83% | 0.71% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.18% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTCIX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than PRPFX's maximum drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCIX and PRPFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTCIX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -27.16% | -36.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -8.10% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -15.49% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.50% | -20.84% | -18.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -8.10% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.17% | -3.52% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 2.22% | +0.52% |
Volatility
GTCIX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison
Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio (GTCIX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) at 3.59%. This indicates that GTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GTCIX | PRPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 3.59% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 11.32% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 13.77% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 11.04% | +2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 10.57% | +4.77% |