PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTCEX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTCEX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly lower than SVPFX's 1.49% return.


GTCEX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.74%
YTD
0.38%
6M
1.68%
1Y
16.17%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.94%

SVPFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.95%
1Y
4.97%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
0.38%14.88%13.41%23.41%-15.53%16.01%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.49%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GTCEX and SVPFX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.12

The correlation between GTCEX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (5 years) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTCEX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTCEX
GTCEX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GTCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTCEXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.35

-0.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

3.40

-1.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.53

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

3.72

-2.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.61

11.52

-6.91

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTCEX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTCEXSVPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.35

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.38

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.39

+0.03

Drawdowns

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTCEX drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCEX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTCEXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.79%

-6.37%

-46.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-1.33%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.30%

-5.32%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-6.37%

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.20%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-1.93%

-8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.55%

0.43%

+3.12%

Volatility

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that GTCEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTCEXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

0.67%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

1.47%

+7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

2.26%

+9.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

5.60%

+15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

5.51%

+14.75%

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTCEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTCEX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

GTCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.84%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
24.84%24.98%11.57%19.78%8.28%11.00%6.12%2.66%2.28%7.61%7.65%9.50%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTCEX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTCEX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTCEX dropped -52.79% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

SVPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTCEX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer