PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTCEX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTCEX achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 22.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GTCEX having a 12.25% annualized return and RESGX not far behind at 12.23%.


GTCEX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.65%
6M
4.60%
YTD
5.69%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
7.81%

RESGX

1D
1.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
16.73%
YTD
22.24%
1Y
34.64%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
9.20%
10Y*
12.23%
ALL TIME*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
5.69%14.88%13.41%23.41%-15.53%26.60%11.39%29.53%-6.83%25.92%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
22.24%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GTCEX and RESGX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between GTCEX and RESGX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTCEX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTCEX
GTCEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GTCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTCEXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

4.06

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

12.85

-8.84

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTCEX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTCEX drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCEX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTCEXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.79%

-37.80%

-14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-7.84%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.30%

-20.50%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-23.58%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-37.80%

+2.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.44%

+4.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-4.98%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

2.50%

+1.20%

Volatility

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTCEXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.62%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

11.33%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

14.97%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.14%

17.31%

+3.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.65%

+1.58%

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GTCEX and RESGX have an expense ratio of 0.85%.


Dividends

GTCEX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

GTCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.56%, more than RESGX's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
23.56%24.98%11.57%19.78%8.28%11.00%6.12%2.66%2.28%7.61%7.65%9.50%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.97%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTCEX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to GTCEX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTCEX dropped -52.79% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTCEX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer