PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTCEX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GTCEX having a 5.69% return and FNSTX slightly lower at 5.53%.


GTCEX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.65%
6M
4.60%
YTD
5.69%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
12.25%
ALL TIME*
7.81%

FNSTX

1D
2.14%
1M
-3.30%
6M
2.35%
YTD
5.53%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
5.69%14.88%13.41%23.41%-15.53%26.60%11.39%3.69%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
5.53%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Correlation

The correlation between GTCEX and FNSTX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between GTCEX and FNSTX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTCEX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GTCEX
GTCEX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GTCEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTCEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTCEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GTCEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTCEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTCEXFNSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.39

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

4.03

-0.02

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTCEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTCEX and FNSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTCEX drawdown since its inception was -52.79%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTCEX and FNSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTCEXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.79%

-35.82%

-16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-8.81%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.30%

-10.94%

-13.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.38%

-21.97%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.86%

+6.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-5.14%

-5.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.70%

3.03%

+0.67%

Volatility

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio (GTCEX) is 3.53%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that GTCEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTCEXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

5.37%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

13.52%

-3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

16.87%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.14%

15.35%

+5.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.23%

18.76%

+1.47%

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTCEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTCEX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

GTCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.56%, more than FNSTX's 3.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.79%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTCEX
Glenmede Strategic Equity Portfolio
23.56%24.98%11.57%19.78%8.28%11.00%6.12%2.66%2.28%7.61%7.65%9.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTCEX and FNSTX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to GTCEX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTCEX dropped -52.79% vs FNSTX's -35.82%.

GTCEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTCEX and FNSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer