PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTAPX vs. GTLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTAPX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly lower than GTLLX's 21.50% return. Over the past 10 years, GTAPX has underperformed GTLLX with an annualized return of 5.85%, while GTLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.08% annualized return.


GTAPX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
4.89%
6M
4.32%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
5.85%

GTLLX

1D
0.12%
1M
7.33%
YTD
21.50%
6M
19.75%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
17.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
4.89%12.79%13.28%4.42%3.16%17.72%-5.16%3.26%-8.65%8.74%
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
21.50%17.44%20.71%27.10%-21.69%32.91%18.80%34.86%-5.23%27.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GTAPX and GTLLX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

0.68

The correlation between GTAPX and GTLLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTAPX vs. GTLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTAPX
GTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GTLLX
GTLLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GTLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
GTLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTAPXGTLLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

3.73

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

14.94

-0.09

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the GTLLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTAPX and GTLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTAPX drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, smaller than the maximum GTLLX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTAPX and GTLLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTAPXGTLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-54.32%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-10.76%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.21%

-41.54%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.21%

-41.54%

+29.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-41.54%

+11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.13%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-8.57%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.67%

-1.69%

Volatility

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) is 2.19%, while Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (GTLLX) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that GTAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTAPXGTLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

7.97%

-5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.25%

14.72%

-9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.86%

18.05%

-11.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.88%

29.13%

-18.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

25.09%

-14.85%

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTAPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GTLLX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTAPX vs. GTLLX - Dividend Comparison

GTAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.81%, more than GTLLX's 12.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
15.81%16.63%11.79%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GTLLX
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Portfolio
12.62%15.33%40.42%4.91%7.93%20.20%15.12%14.10%16.97%2.29%0.58%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTAPX and GTLLX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTLLX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to GTAPX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTAPX dropped -30.40% vs GTLLX's -54.32%.

GTLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTAPX and GTLLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer