GTAPX vs. QAMNX
GTAPX (Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, GTAPX returned 11.22%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for QAMNX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GTAPX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.
Performance
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GTAPX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's -1.17% return.
GTAPX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.85%
QAMNX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 10.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTAPX Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio | 4.89% | 12.79% | 13.28% | 4.42% | 3.16% | 6.24% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | -1.17% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GTAPX and QAMNX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GTAPX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank
GTAPX
QAMNX
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GTAPX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.09 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 0.75 | +4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.86 | 1.67 | +13.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GTAPX drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTAPX and QAMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GTAPX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -17.97% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.01% | -4.16% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.21% | -4.16% | -8.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -3.18% | +2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -5.12% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 1.86% | -0.88% |
Volatility
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) have volatilities of 2.19% and 2.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GTAPX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 2.28% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.25% | 5.25% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 6.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 13.80% | -2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 13.80% | -3.56% |
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GTAPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
GTAPX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison
GTAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.81%, more than QAMNX's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTAPX Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio | 15.81% | 16.63% | 11.79% | 11.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.96% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.55% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GTAPX and QAMNX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAMNX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to GTAPX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTAPX dropped -30.40% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.
GTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GTAPX and QAMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer