PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTAPX vs. CDAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTAPX achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than CDAZX's 9.40% return.


GTAPX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.19%
6M
3.55%
1Y
13.63%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
9.23%
10Y*
5.74%

CDAZX

1D
0.78%
1M
4.42%
YTD
9.40%
6M
8.33%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
4.19%12.79%13.28%4.42%3.16%17.72%-5.16%3.26%-8.65%8.65%
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
9.40%19.20%19.75%3.90%1.31%20.14%-6.39%8.17%-12.03%10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GTAPX and CDAZX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2017

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between GTAPX and CDAZX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTAPX vs. CDAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTAPX
GTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CDAZX
CDAZX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CDAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CDAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GTAPXCDAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

3.65

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

13.53

+0.15

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the CDAZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTAPX and CDAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTAPX drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CDAZX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTAPX and CDAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTAPXCDAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-30.94%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-7.32%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.21%

-8.54%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.21%

-10.91%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

0.00%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-6.11%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.97%

-1.00%

Volatility

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) is 2.13%, while Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) has a volatility of 3.47%. This indicates that GTAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTAPXCDAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

3.47%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

7.66%

-2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.84%

9.78%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

9.22%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

10.06%

+0.17%

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTAPX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAZX's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTAPX vs. CDAZX - Dividend Comparison

GTAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.92%, less than CDAZX's 21.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CDAZX
Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund
21.28%23.28%10.21%1.58%11.48%6.28%0.00%0.79%50.33%3.97%
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
15.92%16.63%11.79%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTAPX and CDAZX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDAZX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to GTAPX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTAPX dropped -30.40% vs CDAZX's -30.94%.

CDAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTAPX and CDAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer