PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GTAIX vs. RQEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GTAIX achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than RQEIX's 8.84% return.


GTAIX

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.24%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.85%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
14.81%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

RQEIX

1D
0.57%
1M
4.90%
YTD
8.84%
6M
9.12%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
11.71%13.49%8.39%15.59%-14.49%9.25%-0.10%16.08%-8.93%
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
8.84%14.97%15.35%20.27%-17.06%-8.45%14.11%7.53%-5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between GTAIX and RQEIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2018

0.68

The correlation between GTAIX and RQEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GTAIX vs. RQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GTAIX
GTAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GTAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

RQEIX
RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GTAIXRQEIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.83

3.46

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.08

5.11

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.69

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

7.98

-2.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.82

20.14

+1.69

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GTAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the RQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GTAIX and RQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GTAIXRQEIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

3.46

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.26

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.23

+0.26

Drawdowns

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GTAIX drawdown since its inception was -24.25%, smaller than the maximum RQEIX drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GTAIX and RQEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GTAIXRQEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.25%

-33.25%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-3.36%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-17.96%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.43%

-32.96%

+13.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-11.27%

+6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.33%

-0.27%

Volatility

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund (GTAIX) is 2.65%, while RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that GTAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GTAIXRQEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

3.44%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.78%

5.33%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

8.04%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

16.75%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.50%

16.03%

-4.53%

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GTAIX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RQEIX's 1.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

GTAIX vs. RQEIX - Dividend Comparison

GTAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, less than RQEIX's 13.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTAIX
Donoghue Forlines Tactical Allocation Fund
4.94%5.82%3.38%2.69%1.65%2.35%0.82%1.77%1.92%
RQEIX
RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund
13.61%14.53%0.38%0.00%0.38%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GTAIX and RQEIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to GTAIX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GTAIX dropped -24.25% vs RQEIX's -33.25%.

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GTAIX and RQEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer