GSUI vs. FTGC
GSUI (Grayscale Sui Staking ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GSUI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk SUI Reference Rate, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. GSUI is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. GSUI charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
GSUI vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSUI achieves a -42.22% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 26.15% return.
GSUI
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -42.22%
- 6M
- -46.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- 26.15%
- 6M
- 24.84%
- 1Y
- 40.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
GSUI vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | -42.22% | -34.63% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 26.15% | 1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSUI and FTGC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSUI vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
GSUI
FTGC
GSUI vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Sui Staking ETF (GSUI) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GSUI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.79 | 0.23 | -1.02 |
Drawdowns
GSUI vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSUI drawdown since its inception was -62.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSUI and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSUI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.23% | -59.47% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.23% | -5.40% | -56.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -27.42% | -16.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility
GSUI vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSUI | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.47% | 15.62% | +91.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.47% | 15.98% | +91.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.47% | 14.71% | +92.76% |
GSUI vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSUI has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GSUI vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
GSUI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.20% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
GSUI Grayscale Sui Staking ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSUI and FTGC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSUI is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSUI is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.00% for GSUI.
GSUI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for GSUI and 0.95% for FTGC.
Find the right allocation for GSUI and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer