PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSRX vs. GFIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than GFIRX's 7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSRX has underperformed GFIRX with an annualized return of 2.42%, while GFIRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.28% annualized return.


GSSRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.39%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.42%

GFIRX

1D
1.22%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
3.18%
10Y*
3.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
7.48%0.54%-5.17%-3.87%20.44%4.86%6.94%2.61%-2.24%2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSRX and GFIRX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

-0.08

The correlation between GSSRX and GFIRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (5 years) to -0.02 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSRX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

GFIRX
GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSRXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.36

-0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.99

3.32

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.44

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

3.93

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.65

12.79

+1.85

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the GFIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSRX and GFIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSRXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.36

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.31

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.36

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.28

+0.69

Drawdowns

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSRX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum GFIRX drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSRX and GFIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSRXGFIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-23.09%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-4.86%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-22.39%

+20.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.88%

-23.09%

+14.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.03%

-23.09%

+14.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-5.93%

+5.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-7.02%

+5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

1.49%

-1.13%

Volatility

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) is 0.71%, while Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that GSSRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSRXGFIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

2.09%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

6.00%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

7.75%

-5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.43%

10.39%

-7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.42%

9.06%

-6.64%

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSRX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison

GSSRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.11%7.35%1.21%7.06%0.16%0.49%0.00%3.98%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSRX and GFIRX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFIRX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSRX dropped -9.03% vs GFIRX's -23.09%.

GFIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSRX and GFIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer