PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSMX vs. GSSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than GSSRX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has outperformed GSSRX with an annualized return of 11.22%, while GSSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.42% annualized return.


GSSMX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.52%
YTD
14.80%
6M
14.12%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.22%

GSSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.29%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
2.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
14.80%10.65%36.03%11.18%-15.00%26.15%1.65%22.75%-14.37%11.85%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
0.83%6.57%4.53%5.28%-6.06%-0.86%5.85%6.79%-0.02%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSMX and GSSRX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.08

The correlation between GSSMX and GSSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSMX vs. GSSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSMX
GSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GSSRX
GSSRX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GSSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSMXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.16

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

3.99

-1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.53

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

2.96

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.05

13.08

-2.03

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the GSSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSMX and GSSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSMXGSSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.16

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.85

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

1.01

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.98

-0.55

Drawdowns

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, which is greater than GSSRX's maximum drawdown of -9.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and GSSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSMXGSSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.94%

-9.03%

-45.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-1.62%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-1.62%

-34.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

-8.88%

-27.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-9.03%

-37.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.10%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-1.26%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.36%

+2.71%

Volatility

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund (GSSRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that GSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSMXGSSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

0.71%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

1.77%

+10.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

2.22%

+15.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

2.43%

+30.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

2.41%

+26.44%

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GSSRX's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSMX vs. GSSRX - Dividend Comparison

GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.57%, more than GSSRX's 4.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
19.57%22.47%47.63%4.49%20.33%22.93%0.19%4.63%13.73%11.34%3.52%5.49%
GSSRX
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Bond Fund
4.35%4.18%3.58%2.36%1.59%1.40%2.20%2.87%2.56%2.21%2.04%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSMX and GSSRX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSSMX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to GSSRX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSMX dropped -54.94% vs GSSRX's -9.03%.

GSSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSMX and GSSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer