PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSSMX vs. GSIFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSSMX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly higher than GSIFX's 6.83% return. Over the past 10 years, GSSMX has outperformed GSIFX with an annualized return of 11.22%, while GSIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.


GSSMX

1D
1.11%
1M
2.52%
YTD
14.80%
6M
14.12%
1Y
32.02%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
11.22%

GSIFX

1D
0.50%
1M
4.77%
YTD
6.83%
6M
9.07%
1Y
13.85%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
6.27%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
14.80%10.65%36.03%11.18%-15.00%26.15%1.65%22.75%-14.37%11.85%
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
6.83%25.51%0.33%15.44%-17.69%16.23%22.89%27.68%-14.85%25.29%

Correlation

The correlation between GSSMX and GSIFX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1993

0.59

The correlation between GSSMX and GSIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSSMX vs. GSIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSSMX
GSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIFX
GSIFX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GSIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSSMXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.88

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.78

1.31

+1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.16

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.11

+2.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.05

4.24

+6.82

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the GSIFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSSMX and GSIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSSMXGSIFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.88

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.37

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.32

+0.10

Drawdowns

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSSMX drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, smaller than the maximum GSIFX drawdown of -59.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSSMX and GSIFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSSMXGSIFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.94%

-59.25%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-12.15%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-13.83%

-22.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.28%

-31.94%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-35.00%

-11.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.54%

-0.15%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-15.23%

+5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

3.18%

-0.11%

Volatility

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund (GSSMX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A (GSIFX) at 4.89%. This indicates that GSSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSSMXGSIFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.89%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

12.38%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.86%

15.46%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.69%

16.93%

+15.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.85%

17.40%

+11.45%

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSSMX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIFX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSSMX vs. GSIFX - Dividend Comparison

GSSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.57%, more than GSIFX's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIFX
Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class A
2.04%2.18%2.30%1.37%0.82%6.29%0.00%1.67%1.45%1.25%2.79%1.16%
GSSMX
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund
19.57%22.47%47.63%4.49%20.33%22.93%0.19%4.63%13.73%11.34%3.52%5.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSSMX and GSIFX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSSMX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to GSIFX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSSMX dropped -54.94% vs GSIFX's -59.25%.

GSSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSSMX and GSIFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer