GSPX.L vs. ISF.L
GSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - GSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GSPX.L returned 12.13%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for ISF.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GSPX.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for ISF.L.
Performance
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GSPX.L is traded in GBP, while ISF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISF.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSPX.L achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than ISF.L's 7.07% return.
GSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ISF.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 8.24% | 17.16% | 24.72% | 24.87% | -20.64% | 28.96% | 15.11% | 27.76% | -7.71% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.07% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 4.83% | 17.68% | -11.67% | 17.11% | -9.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GSPX.L and ISF.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between GSPX.L and ISF.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Financial Services
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Communication Services
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Consumer Cyclical
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Healthcare
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Industrials
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Consumer Defensive
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Energy
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Utilities
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Real Estate
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Basic Materials
GSPX.L
ISF.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L — Risk / Return Rank
GSPX.L
ISF.L
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) and iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GSPX.L | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.40 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.14 | 7.89 | +4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.98%, smaller than the maximum ISF.L drawdown of -45.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPX.L and ISF.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GSPX.L | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.98% | -45.00% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -8.82% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -12.69% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -12.69% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -3.05% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -6.45% | +0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 2.68% | -0.70% |
Volatility
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that GSPX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GSPX.L | ISF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 3.51% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 9.53% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 10.94% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 12.59% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 14.84% | +2.85% |
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSPX.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ISF.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GSPX.L vs. ISF.L - Dividend Comparison
GSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than ISF.L's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.82% | 0.89% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 0.96% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.71% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GSPX.L and ISF.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GSPX.L.
GSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ISF.L is Europe Equities. GSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GSPX.L and 0.07% for ISF.L.
Find the right allocation for GSPX.L and ISF.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer