PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GSPX.L is traded in GBP, while ICSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSPX.L achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than ICSU.L's 6.60% return.


GSPX.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.53%
YTD
10.04%
6M
10.80%
1Y
27.24%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
12.56%
10Y*

ICSU.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
6.60%
6M
6.25%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.04%17.15%24.63%24.88%-20.60%28.94%15.10%27.75%-8.17%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.60%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%22.78%3.15%

Correlation

The correlation between GSPX.L and ICSU.L is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018

0.23

The correlation between GSPX.L and ICSU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GSPX.L
ICSU.L

Technology

38.6%

-

Financial Services

11.3%

-

Communication Services

10.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
1.0%

Healthcare

8.2%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
99.0%

Energy

3.3%

-

Utilities

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Technology

GSPX.L
38.6%
ICSU.L

-

Financial Services

GSPX.L
11.3%
ICSU.L

-

Communication Services

GSPX.L
10.6%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GSPX.L
9.6%
ICSU.L
1.0%

Healthcare

GSPX.L
8.2%
ICSU.L

-

Industrials

GSPX.L
7.6%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GSPX.L
4.6%
ICSU.L
99.0%

Energy

GSPX.L
3.3%
ICSU.L

-

Utilities

GSPX.L
2.6%
ICSU.L

-

Basic Materials

GSPX.L
1.7%
ICSU.L

-

Real Estate

GSPX.L
1.7%
ICSU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSPX.L
GSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSPX.LICSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.05

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

0.34

+2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.09

0.82

+13.27

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSPX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSPX.L and ICSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSPX.LICSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

0.22

+2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.59

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.48

+0.30

Drawdowns

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -34.88%, which is greater than ICSU.L's maximum drawdown of -18.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSPX.L and ICSU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSPX.LICSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.88%

-18.54%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-9.24%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

-11.59%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.77%

-13.70%

-12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-7.40%

+6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-4.93%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.87%

-1.94%

Volatility

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) is 3.17%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that GSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSPX.LICSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

6.57%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

11.97%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

14.37%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

13.45%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

14.31%

+3.32%

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSPX.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GSPX.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison

GSPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while ICSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.80%0.89%0.99%1.15%1.40%0.96%1.31%1.50%0.11%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSPX.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GSPX.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GSPX.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for ICSU.L.

GSPX.L is categorized as S&P 500, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. GSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GSPX.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSPX.L and ICSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer